ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) (FFRCT) for functional myocardial ischemia.Methods Thirty-nine patients undergone coronary CTA and FFR examination from Aug.2012 to Jul.2015 in PLA General Hospital were retrospectively included in present study.Measurements of invasive FFR value was used as reference standard,and FFRCT based on coronary CTA image was performed in either per-patient or per-vessel level to assess the accuracy,specificity,sensitivity,the positive predictive value and negative predictive value for functional myocardial ischemia.Results In per-patient level,the accuracy of FFRCT was 82.05％,sensitivity was 83.33％,specificity was 80.95％,positive predictive value was 78.95％ and negative predictive value was 85.00％.In per-vessel level,the accuracy of FFRCT was 76.79％,sensitivity was 69.57％,specificity was 81.82％,positive predictive value was 72.73％ and negative predictive value was 79.41％.The area under ROC was 0.826 in per-patient level,and 0.786 in per-vessel level.For per-vessel,FFRCT was positively correlated with FFR value significantly (r=0.644;95％CI:0.458-0.775).Conclusion With FFR as reference standard,domestic noninvasive FFRCT can be used for the diagnosis of functional myocardial ischemia with high diagnostic performance and clinical application prospect.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has been widely used in patients who are at intermediate risk for having stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), and 2013 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the Management of SCAD (2013G) recommended the appropriate application of CCTA. However, 2013G has not been subjected to systematic analyses for subsequent impact on clinical practice.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 5320 patients suspected with SCAD were enrolled and scheduled for CCTA from March 2013 to September 2014. For each patient, pretest probability of SCAD was calculated according to updated Diamond-Forrester model (UDFM). Appropriate CCTA or appropriate stress test was determined as described in the 2013G. A generalized estimating equation model was used to determine the trends in the half-monthly rate of appropriate CCTA.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Overall, only 61.37% of patients received appropriate CCTA, and there was insignificant change over time (P = 0.8701). The application of CCTA in patients who should have had a stress test accounted for most of the inappropriate CCTA before (22.29%) or after (19.98%) the publication of the 2013G. In all patients or any subgroup, no significant change in the adjusted half-monthly rate of appropriate CCTA was found after the publication of the 2013G (odds ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 0.982-1.021; P = 0.8678).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>These findings suggest that the 2013G have not, to date, been fully incorporated into clinical practice, and the clinical utilization of CCTA remains unreasonable to some extent.</p>
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Coronary Angiography , Methods , Coronary Artery Disease , Diagnosis , Odds RatioABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the influence of stenting main vessel on side branches and to compare the different effects on side branches between BMS and DES (Taxus and Cypher).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We reviewed the angiograms and the medical records of 183 patients who had received stent implantation in coronary main vessels and had follow-up angiograms. Any side branch was jailed by stent was evaluated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Side branch occlusion occurred in 8.9% in all branches (10.5% in Cypher DES group, 11.1% in Taxus DES group and 7.8% in BMS group). Spontaneous recanalization of side branches was observed in 72% (90.9% in Cypher DES, 66.7% in Taxus stent group and 66.7% in BMS). The ostial side branch stenosis before stenting and the involvement of the side branch origin within the lesion of the parent vessel are the major independent predictors for side branch occlusion.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The influence of different DES implantations in coronary main vessels on side branches were similar and there was no difference between DES and BMS. Side branch occlusion had relatively benign clinical course. Most occluded side branches had late spontaneous reperfusion.</p>